也不知道为什么，就是觉得很疲惫
很累
按理说应该累，五门课么
三月底四月初，很多东西要交要做
固然会很疲惫
只是这么多年没有这么累过
也许是我老了？
也可能是天气原因，都四月了也不暖和，还那么冷，没有春天的味道
唉，机票订好了，7月2日，还有93天
不知道回去是不是更累，当然如果因为老婆累，那还是很值得

这个话题呢，已经快被人说滥了
其实恨人有笑人无这种事情，谁都有
曾几何时我们说这东西是中国人的劣根性云云
而老外也是有的
是人，你只要是两条胳膊两条腿的人，你就得有嫉妒心理，你就得有那种别人有了我没有的恐慌感
只不过呢，网络这东西，把大家的脸都扭曲了，把大家的身份都隐藏了之后
恨人有笑人无这种“优良品德”得以无限放大与扩张
基本到了无以复加的地步
当然，网络上的这种夸张表现，怎么说也比较直接而且简单，对于当事双方往往不会造成如其表面表达的那么激烈的后果
最多也就是一番网上对骂，痛快痛快嘴而已

现实生活中呢，其实大家并不太敢于直接的把这种“优良品德”表现出来
在国内的，这基本因为和咱们5k年历史的君子之道相左
在国外呢，这基本因位不太礼貌
其实归根结底的主要原因，是怕招恨招打惹麻烦
朋友买了件新衣服，很贵很漂亮
当着朋友的面
大概我们都会表示赞赏和欣赏一类的情绪，说很适合你等等
背地里呢，心里呢？
心里想的和嘴上说的一致的人的数量，恐怕不会有看上去那么多
说白了，还是嫉妒
而有些人呢，可能会把这种嫉妒用一种方式表现出来
比较温柔的，可能会说一些棉里带针的话，刺激刺激对方
而比较阴险的，恐怕就会想办法搞死对方了
所以，现实中的恨人有笑人无，要比网络上可怕很多

嫉妒呢，是人的一种与生俱来的性格
其它动物也会嫉妒，比如狗，猫
一个人对于嫉妒的处理方式
和他/她对于自己命运的掌控能力
是成一定比例的
能够很好的处理嫉妒这种情绪的人，往往都对自己的命运有比较强的掌控能力
反之呢，对于嫉妒不能好好处理的人，往往最后会发现自己的一生都是在别的人影响下活过来的
没有一点自我掌控与理解
其实嫉妒有时也是好事，让人知道自己的差距
关键就是在与怎么处理这个差距
你可以奋发图强，韬光养晦的发展自己的能力
然后慢慢的，或者厚积勃发的一举超过你嫉妒的对象，来达到自我的升华与成功
当然也可如地痞泼妇一般的破口大骂，咬牙切齿，恨不得将对方生啖而后快
只是这种选择最后的结果，可能会让你发现自己的一生过来，留下的只有那酸酸的嫉妒了

人要怎么活，要怎么做，要怎么去面对，怎么去理解一件事物
那是人自己的事情
我们想再怎么管，想再怎么去干涉与改变，往往都是徒劳
只有自己真的明白了的那一刻，他/她才知道什么是对，什么是错
还是得看自己啊

中国不买美国国债
美国就来这套不要脸的
今天美国联邦储备局宣布要买美国政府的国债，同时给钱救房市
总额在1.2 trillion dollars
这就等于是说，联邦储备局要开始印美元了
这个消息绝对是炸弹
把今天的汇市/黄金市场炸了个一片混乱

美国啊美国，你这真的是太不要脸了
全世界那么多国家持有你的国债，还都是美元形式的
你这开始印钞票，这些美元就会开始一天比一天不值钱
然后这些相关国家都会开始在自己的钞票上做手脚来保持美元的比值不要跌
简直就会造成天下大乱的

就你这样的还世界第一？你世界第一就是他妈的耍流氓耍来的！
等着出大乱子吧....

It's a huge issue out there so if you got no clue about it still, you are kind of lame.
Just read through it. Help you to see the big picture, for sure.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Jan 28, 2009, the U.S House of Representatives approved President Barack Obama’s $819 billion stimulus package, which indicated for the States the battle of fighting the current economic recession has formally launched. Despite the fact that the package still needs to go through the Senate for debate, one specific clause --- which is known as the “Buy American” clause by the public, has drawn quite much attention world widely. The actual clause, which is also known as the Section 1110 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, bans foreign iron and steel in infrastructure projects backed by the $819-billion economic stimulus plan. It indicates all the iron and steel that may use in the 2009 U.S. infrastructure projects must be produced in U.S. The House bill also requires that the uniforms and other textiles used by the Transportation Security Administration be produced in the U.S. Moreover, the Senate is currently preparing a version of the bill that goes further to require that “all stimulus-funded projects use only American-made equipment and goods - everything from computer software to hard hats.” Chris Braddock, a policy director with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce said, "When you include all manufactured goods in these projects, you're talking about every shovel, every crane ... It's not just the steel going into bridges. Now it's the truck that is involved in building the bridge or the road." (PFNA)

Many countries have argued the movement of the U.S government regarding this clause may encourage global protectionism, which could lead to more severe damage to the global economy, that according to Paul Krugam of The New York Times, if every country were to go protectionist, 70 years of trade negotiations may be shattered. (New York Times) Although G20 countries had agreed not to adopt protectionist measures, this new American provision essentially amounts to an American economic declaration of war on the rest of the world, (Buiter) and could possibly trigger "a cycle of trade retaliation that would strangle world commerce and undermine efforts to end the global economic crisis."(Calgary Herald) The American Smoot-Hawley tariffs in 1930 triggered a wave of protectionism, turning the recession of 1929 into the Great Depression. (PFNA) On the other hand, arguments and critiques especially rising from countries like Canada, whose economy is seen having strong correlation with the U.S traditionally, that some of the business owners in Canada have shown “grave, gave concerns” towards the “Buy American” clause. (CBC.ca) As the top trading partner of the Canadian government, Canada exports about $6 billion worth of steel and iron to the U.S every year. The restriction on the market certainly would hurt the Canadian business in obvious degree, especially during the current economic crisis. Thus Canada's ambassador to the United States, Michael Wilson, has already started to personally lobbying the White House and presenting arguments that the plan violates the North American Free Trade Agreement. (CBC.ca)

On the other hand, the provisions have attracted a great deal of political support on Capitol Hill. Vice President Joe Biden indicated to the press, that he doesn’t see “there is anything anti-competitive or anti-trade in saying, we are stimulating the U.S. economy, and the purpose is to create U.S. jobs.”(CBC.CA) On the meantime, different voices also have raised from different U.S industries, that while steel, iron and textile manufacturers and labour unions strongly supporting a broader Buy American provision, large U.S. exporters, including General Electric and Caterpillar, have come out strongly against the measure, arguing that it could ignite strong retaliation against American companies overseas. (Washington Post)